<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web02.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 05:54:37 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>BSD Now - Episodes Tagged with “Nanobsd”</title>
    <link>https://www.bsdnow.tv/tags/nanobsd</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>Created by three guys who love BSD, we cover the latest news and have an extensive series of tutorials, as well as interviews with various people from all areas of the BSD community. It also serves as a platform for support and questions. We love and advocate FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, DragonFlyBSD and TrueOS. Our show aims to be helpful and informative for new users that want to learn about them, but still be entertaining for the people who are already pros.
The show airs on Wednesdays at 2:00PM (US Eastern time) and the edited version is usually up the following day. 
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>A weekly podcast and the place to B...SD</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>JT Pennington</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Created by three guys who love BSD, we cover the latest news and have an extensive series of tutorials, as well as interviews with various people from all areas of the BSD community. It also serves as a platform for support and questions. We love and advocate FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, DragonFlyBSD and TrueOS. Our show aims to be helpful and informative for new users that want to learn about them, but still be entertaining for the people who are already pros.
The show airs on Wednesdays at 2:00PM (US Eastern time) and the edited version is usually up the following day. 
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/c/c91b88f1-e824-4815-bcb8-5227818d6010/cover.jpg?v=4"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>berkeley,freebsd,openbsd,netbsd,dragonflybsd,trueos,trident,hardenedbsd,tutorial,howto,guide,bsd,interview</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>JT Pennington</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>feedback@bsdnow.tv</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="News">
  <itunes:category text="Tech News"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Education">
  <itunes:category text="How To"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>99: BSD Gnow</title>
  <link>https://www.bsdnow.tv/99</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">c234f2ea-9f17-4c25-bd28-db41586b32de</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>JT Pennington</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/c91b88f1-e824-4815-bcb8-5227818d6010/c234f2ea-9f17-4c25-bd28-db41586b32de.mp3" length="57071380" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>JT Pennington</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>This week we'll be talking with Ryan Lortie and Baptiste Daroussin about GNOME on BSD. Upstream development is finally treating the BSDs as a first class citizen, so we'll hear about how the recent porting efforts have been since.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:19:15</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/c/c91b88f1-e824-4815-bcb8-5227818d6010/cover.jpg?v=4"/>
  <description>This week we'll be talking with Ryan Lortie and Baptiste Daroussin about GNOME on BSD. Upstream development is finally treating the BSDs as a first class citizen, so we'll hear about how the recent porting efforts have been since.
This episode was brought to you by
&lt;a href="http://www.ixsystems.com/bsdnow" title="iXsystems"&gt;&lt;img src="/images/1.png" alt="iXsystems - Enterprise Servers and Storage for Open Source"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.digitalocean.com/" title="DigitalOcean"&gt;&lt;img src="/images/2.png" alt="DigitalOcean - Simple Cloud Hosting, Built for Developers"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tarsnap.com/bsdnow" title="Tarsnap"&gt;&lt;img src="/images/3.png" alt="Tarsnap - Online Backups for the Truly Paranoid"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
Headlines
OpenBSD presents tame (https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&amp;amp;m=143725996614627&amp;amp;w=2)
Theo de Raadt sent out an email detailing OpenBSD's new "tame" subsystem, written by Nicholas Marriott and himself, for restricting what processes can and can't do
When using tame, programs will switch to a "restricted-service operating mode," limiting them to only the things they actually need to do
As for the background: "Generally there are two models of operation. The first model requires a major rewrite of application software for effective use (ie. capsicum). The other model in common use lacks granularity, and allows or denies an operation throughout the entire lifetime of a process. As a result, they lack differentiation between program 'initialization' versus 'main servicing loop.' systrace had the same problem. My observation is that programs need a large variety of calls during initialization, but few in their main loops."
Some initial categories of operation include: computation, memory management, read-write operations on file descriptors, opening of files and, of course, networking
Restrictions can also be stacked further into the lifespan of the process, but removed abilities can never be regained (obviously)
Anything that tries to access resources outside of its in-place limits gets terminated with a SIGKILL or, optionally, a SIGABRT (which can produce useful core dumps for investigation)
Also included are 29 examples of userland programs that get additional protection with very minimal changes to the source - only 2 or 3 lines needing changed in the case of binaries like cat, ps, dmesg, etc.
This is an initial work-in-progress version of tame, so there may be more improvements or further (https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&amp;amp;m=143740834710502&amp;amp;w=2) control (https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&amp;amp;m=143741052411159&amp;amp;w=2) options added before it hits a release (very specific access policies can sometimes backfire (https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&amp;amp;t=2522), however)
The man page, also included in the mail, provides some specifics about how to integrate tame properly into your code (which, by design, was made very easy to do - making it simple means third party programs are more likely to actually use it)
Kernel bits are in the tree now (https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&amp;amp;m=143727335416513&amp;amp;w=2), with userland changes starting to trickle in too
Combined with a myriad of memory protections (http://www.bsdnow.tv/episodes/2015_05_13-exclusive_disjunction), tight privilege separation and (above all else (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBSD_security_features)) good coding practices, tame should further harden the OpenBSD security fortress
Further discussion (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9928221) can (https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3dsr0t) be (http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&amp;amp;sid=20150719000800&amp;amp;mode=flat) found (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9909429) in (https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3ds66o) the (https://lobste.rs/s/tbbtfs) usual (https://www.reddit.com/r/openbsd/comments/3ds64c) places (https://www.reddit.com/r/BSD/comments/3ds681) you'd expect
***
Using Docker on FreeBSD (https://wiki.freebsd.org/Docker)
With the experimental Docker port landing in FreeBSD a few weeks ago, some initial docs are starting to show up
This docker is "the real thing," and isn’t using a virtual machine as the backend - as such, it has some limitations
The FreeBSD wiki has a page detailing how it works in general, as well as more info about those limitations
When running Linux containers, it will only work as well as the Linux ABI compat layer for your version of FreeBSD (11.0, or -CURRENT when we're recording this, is where all the action is for 64bit support)
For users on 10.X, there's also a FreeBSD container available, which allows you to use Docker as a fancy jail manager (it uses the jail subsystem internally)
Give it a try, let us know how you find it to be compared to other solutions
***
OpenBSD imports doas, removes sudo (http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/doas)
OpenBSD has included the ubiquitous "sudo" utility for many years now, and the current maintainer of sudo (Todd C. Miller) is also a long-time OpenBSD dev
The version included in the base system was much smaller than the latest current version used elsewhere, but was based on older code
Some internal discussion lead to the decision that sudo should probably be moved to ports now, where it can be updated easily and offer all the extra features that were missing in base (LDAP and whatnot)
Ted Unangst conjured up with a rewritten utility to replace it in the base system, dubbed "do as," with the aim of being more simple and compact
There were concerns that sudo was too big and too complicated, and a quick 'n' dirty check reveals that doas is around 350 lines of code, while sudo is around 10,000 - which would you rather have as a setuid root binary?
After the initial import, a number of developers began reviewing and improving various bits here and there
You can check out the code (http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/doas/) now if you're interested
Command usage (http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man1/doas.1) and config syntax (http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man5/doas.conf.5) seem pretty straightforward
More discussion (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9914693) on HN
***
What would you like to see in FreeBSD (https://www.reddit.com/r/freebsd/comments/3d80vt/what_would_you_like_to_see_in_freebsd/)
Adrian Chadd started a reddit thread about areas in which FreeBSD could be improved, asking the community what they'd like to see
There are over 200 comments that span a wide range of topics, so we'll just cover a few of the more popular requests - check the very long thread if you're interested in more
The top comment says things don't "just work," citing failover link aggregation of LACP laggs, PPPoE issues, disorganized jail configuration options, unclear CARP configuration and userland dtrace being unstable
Another common one was that there are three firewalls in the base system, with ipfilter and pf being kinda dead now - should they be removed, and more focus put into ipfw?
Video drivers also came up frequently, with users hoping for better OpenGL support and support for newer graphics cards from Intel and AMD - similar comments were made about wireless chipsets as well
Some other replies included more clarity with pkgng output, paying more attention to security issues, updating PF to match the one in OpenBSD, improved laptop support, a graphical installer, LibreSSL in base, more focus on embedded MIPS devices, binary packages with different config options, steam support and lots more
At least one user suggested better "marketing" for FreeBSD, with more advocacy and (hopefully) more business adoption
That one really applies to all the BSDs, and regular users (that's you listening to this) can help make it happen for whichever ones you use right now
Maybe Adrian can singlehandedly do all the work and make all the users happy
***
Interview - Ryan Lortie &amp;amp; Baptiste Daroussin
Porting the latest GNOME code to FreeBSD
News Roundup
Introducing resflash (http://stable.rcesoftware.com/resflash/)
If you haven't heard of resflash before, it's "a tool for building OpenBSD images for embedded and cloud environments in a programmatic, reproducible way"
One of the major benefits to images like this is the read-only filesystem, so there's no possibility of filesystem corruption if power is lost
There's an optional read-write partition as well, used for any persistent changes you want to make
You can check out the source code on Github (https://github.com/bconway/resflash) or read the main site for more info
***
Jails with iocage (http://pid1.com/posts/post10.html)
There are a growing number of FreeBSD jail management utilities: ezjail, cbsd, warden and a few others
After looking at all the different choices, the author of this blog post eventually settled on iocage (https://github.com/iocage/iocage) for the job
The post walks you through the basic configuration and usage of iocage for creating managing jails
If you've been unhappy with ezjail or some of the others, iocage might be worth giving a try instead (it also has really good ZFS integration)
***
DragonFly GPU improvements (http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2015-July/207892.html)
DragonFlyBSD continues to up their graphics game, this time with Intel's ValleyView series of CPUs
These GPUs are primarily used in the newer Atom CPUs and offer much better performance than the older ones
A git branch was created to hold the fixes for now while the last remaining bugs get fixed
Fully-accelerated Broadwell support and an update to newer DRM code are also available in the git branch, and will be merged to the main tree after some testing
***
Branchless development (http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/branchless-development)
Ted Unangst has a new blog post up, talking about software branches and the effects of having (or not having) them
He covers integrating and merging code, and the versioning problems that can happen with multiple people contributing at once
"For an open source project, branching is counter intuitively antisocial. For instance, I usually tell people I’m running OpenBSD, but that’s kind of a lie. I’m actually running teduBSD, which is like OpenBSD but has some changes to make it even better. Of course, you can’t have teduBSD because I’m selfish. I’m also lazy, and only inclined to make my changes work for me, not everyone else."
The solution, according to him, is bringing all the code the developers are using closer together
One big benefit is that WIP code gets tested much faster (and bugs get fixed early on)
***
Feedback/Questions
Matthew writes in (http://slexy.org/view/s21yQtBCCK)
Chris writes in (http://slexy.org/view/s21oFA80kY)
Anonymous writes in (http://slexy.org/view/s2JYvTlJlm)
Bill writes in (http://slexy.org/view/s21LXvk53z)
*** 
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>freebsd, openbsd, netbsd, dragonflybsd, pcbsd, tutorial, howto, guide, bsd, interview, gnome, gnome shell, gnome3, puns i will regret forever, doas, sudo, resflash, flashrd, nanobsd, tame, capsicum, iocage, ezjail, docker</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>This week we&#39;ll be talking with Ryan Lortie and Baptiste Daroussin about GNOME on BSD. Upstream development is finally treating the BSDs as a first class citizen, so we&#39;ll hear about how the recent porting efforts have been since.</p>

<h2>This episode was brought to you by</h2>

<p><a href="http://www.ixsystems.com/bsdnow" title="iXsystems"><img src="/images/1.png" alt="iXsystems - Enterprise Servers and Storage for Open Source" /></a><a href="http://www.digitalocean.com/" title="DigitalOcean"><img src="/images/2.png" alt="DigitalOcean - Simple Cloud Hosting, Built for Developers" /></a><a href="http://www.tarsnap.com/bsdnow" title="Tarsnap"><img src="/images/3.png" alt="Tarsnap - Online Backups for the Truly Paranoid" /></a></p>

<hr>

<h2>Headlines</h2>

<h3><a href="https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=143725996614627&w=2" rel="nofollow">OpenBSD presents tame</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>Theo de Raadt sent out an email detailing OpenBSD&#39;s new &quot;tame&quot; subsystem, written by Nicholas Marriott and himself, for restricting what processes can and can&#39;t do</li>
<li>When using tame, programs will switch to a &quot;restricted-service operating mode,&quot; limiting them to only the things they actually need to do</li>
<li>As for the background: &quot;Generally there are two models of operation. The first model requires a major rewrite of application software for effective use (ie. capsicum). The other model in common use lacks granularity, and allows or denies an operation throughout the entire lifetime of a process. As a result, they lack differentiation between program &#39;initialization&#39; versus &#39;main servicing loop.&#39; systrace had the same problem. My observation is that programs need a large variety of calls during initialization, but few in their main loops.&quot;</li>
<li>Some initial categories of operation include: computation, memory management, read-write operations on file descriptors, opening of files and, of course, networking</li>
<li>Restrictions can also be stacked further into the lifespan of the process, but removed abilities can never be regained (obviously)</li>
<li>Anything that tries to access resources outside of its in-place limits gets terminated with a SIGKILL or, optionally, a SIGABRT (which can produce useful core dumps for investigation)</li>
<li>Also included are 29 examples of userland programs that get additional protection with very minimal changes to the source - only 2 or 3 lines needing changed in the case of binaries like cat, ps, dmesg, etc.</li>
<li>This is an initial work-in-progress version of tame, so there may be more improvements or <a href="https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=143740834710502&w=2" rel="nofollow">further</a> <a href="https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=143741052411159&w=2" rel="nofollow">control</a> options added before it hits a release (very specific access policies can <a href="https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2522" rel="nofollow">sometimes backfire</a>, however)</li>
<li>The man page, also included in the mail, provides some specifics about how to integrate tame properly into your code (which, by design, was made very easy to do - making it simple means third party programs are more likely to <em>actually use it</em>)</li>
<li>Kernel bits are <a href="https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=143727335416513&w=2" rel="nofollow">in the tree now</a>, with userland changes starting to trickle in too</li>
<li>Combined with a <a href="http://www.bsdnow.tv/episodes/2015_05_13-exclusive_disjunction" rel="nofollow">myriad of memory protections</a>, tight privilege separation and (above <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBSD_security_features" rel="nofollow">all else</a>) good coding practices, tame should further harden the OpenBSD security fortress</li>
<li>Further <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9928221" rel="nofollow">discussion</a> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3dsr0t" rel="nofollow">can</a> <a href="http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20150719000800&mode=flat" rel="nofollow">be</a> <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9909429" rel="nofollow">found</a> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3ds66o" rel="nofollow">in</a> <a href="https://lobste.rs/s/tbbtfs" rel="nofollow">the</a> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/openbsd/comments/3ds64c" rel="nofollow">usual</a> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/BSD/comments/3ds681" rel="nofollow">places</a> you&#39;d expect
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="https://wiki.freebsd.org/Docker" rel="nofollow">Using Docker on FreeBSD</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>With the experimental Docker port landing in FreeBSD a few weeks ago, some initial docs are starting to show up</li>
<li>This docker is &quot;the real thing,&quot; and isn’t using a virtual machine as the backend - as such, it has some limitations</li>
<li>The FreeBSD wiki has a page detailing how it works in general, as well as more info about those limitations</li>
<li>When running Linux containers, it will only work as well as the Linux ABI compat layer for your version of FreeBSD (11.0, or -CURRENT when we&#39;re recording this, is where all the action is for 64bit support)</li>
<li>For users on 10.X, there&#39;s also a FreeBSD container available, which allows you to use Docker as a fancy jail manager (it uses the jail subsystem internally)</li>
<li>Give it a try, let us know how you find it to be compared to other solutions
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/doas" rel="nofollow">OpenBSD imports doas, removes sudo</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>OpenBSD has included the ubiquitous &quot;sudo&quot; utility for many years now, and the current maintainer of sudo (Todd C. Miller) is also a long-time OpenBSD dev</li>
<li>The version included in the base system was much smaller than the latest current version used elsewhere, but was based on older code</li>
<li>Some internal discussion lead to the decision that sudo should probably be moved to ports now, where it can be updated easily and offer all the extra features that were missing in base (LDAP and whatnot)</li>
<li>Ted Unangst conjured up with a rewritten utility to replace it in the base system, dubbed &quot;do as,&quot; with the aim of being more simple and compact</li>
<li>There were concerns that sudo was too big and too complicated, and a quick &#39;n&#39; dirty check reveals that doas is around 350 lines of code, while sudo is around 10,000 - which would you rather have as a setuid root binary?</li>
<li>After the initial import, a number of developers began reviewing and improving various bits here and there</li>
<li>You can <a href="http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/doas/" rel="nofollow">check out the code</a> now if you&#39;re interested</li>
<li><a href="http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man1/doas.1" rel="nofollow">Command usage</a> and <a href="http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man5/doas.conf.5" rel="nofollow">config syntax</a> seem pretty straightforward</li>
<li>More <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9914693" rel="nofollow">discussion</a> on HN
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/freebsd/comments/3d80vt/what_would_you_like_to_see_in_freebsd/" rel="nofollow">What would you like to see in FreeBSD</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>Adrian Chadd started a reddit thread about areas in which FreeBSD could be improved, asking the community what they&#39;d like to see</li>
<li>There are over <strong>200</strong> comments that span a wide range of topics, so we&#39;ll just cover a few of the more popular requests - check the very long thread if you&#39;re interested in more</li>
<li>The top comment says things don&#39;t &quot;just work,&quot; citing failover link aggregation of LACP laggs, PPPoE issues, disorganized jail configuration options, unclear CARP configuration and userland dtrace being unstable</li>
<li>Another common one was that there are <em>three</em> firewalls in the base system, with ipfilter and pf being kinda dead now - should they be removed, and more focus put into ipfw?</li>
<li>Video drivers also came up frequently, with users hoping for better OpenGL support and support for newer graphics cards from Intel and AMD - similar comments were made about wireless chipsets as well</li>
<li>Some other replies included more clarity with pkgng output, paying more attention to security issues, updating PF to match the one in OpenBSD, improved laptop support, a graphical installer, LibreSSL in base, more focus on embedded MIPS devices, binary packages with different config options, steam support and lots more</li>
<li>At least one user suggested better &quot;marketing&quot; for FreeBSD, with more advocacy and (hopefully) more business adoption</li>
<li>That one really applies to all the BSDs, and regular users (that&#39;s you listening to this) can help make it happen for whichever ones you use <em>right now</em></li>
<li>Maybe Adrian can singlehandedly do all the work and make all the users happy
***</li>
</ul>

<h2>Interview - Ryan Lortie &amp; Baptiste Daroussin</h2>

<p>Porting the latest GNOME code to FreeBSD</p>

<hr>

<h2>News Roundup</h2>

<h3><a href="http://stable.rcesoftware.com/resflash/" rel="nofollow">Introducing resflash</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>If you haven&#39;t heard of resflash before, it&#39;s &quot;a tool for building OpenBSD images for embedded and cloud environments in a programmatic, reproducible way&quot;</li>
<li>One of the major benefits to images like this is the read-only filesystem, so there&#39;s no possibility of filesystem corruption if power is lost</li>
<li>There&#39;s an optional read-write partition as well, used for any persistent changes you want to make</li>
<li>You can check out the source code <a href="https://github.com/bconway/resflash" rel="nofollow">on Github</a> or read the main site for more info
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="http://pid1.com/posts/post10.html" rel="nofollow">Jails with iocage</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>There are a growing number of FreeBSD jail management utilities: ezjail, cbsd, warden and a few others</li>
<li>After looking at all the different choices, the author of this blog post eventually settled on <a href="https://github.com/iocage/iocage" rel="nofollow">iocage</a> for the job</li>
<li>The post walks you through the basic configuration and usage of iocage for creating managing jails</li>
<li>If you&#39;ve been unhappy with ezjail or some of the others, iocage might be worth giving a try instead (it also has really good ZFS integration)
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2015-July/207892.html" rel="nofollow">DragonFly GPU improvements</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>DragonFlyBSD continues to up their graphics game, this time with Intel&#39;s ValleyView series of CPUs</li>
<li>These GPUs are primarily used in the newer Atom CPUs and offer much better performance than the older ones</li>
<li>A git branch was created to hold the fixes for now while the last remaining bugs get fixed</li>
<li>Fully-accelerated Broadwell support and an update to newer DRM code are also available in the git branch, and will be merged to the main tree after some testing
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/branchless-development" rel="nofollow">Branchless development</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>Ted Unangst has a new blog post up, talking about software branches and the effects of having (or not having) them</li>
<li>He covers integrating and merging code, and the versioning problems that can happen with multiple people contributing at once</li>
<li>&quot;For an open source project, branching is counter intuitively antisocial. For instance, I usually tell people I’m running OpenBSD, but that’s kind of a lie. I’m actually running teduBSD, which is like OpenBSD but has some changes to make it even better. Of course, you can’t have teduBSD because I’m selfish. I’m also lazy, and only inclined to make my changes work for me, not everyone else.&quot;</li>
<li>The solution, according to him, is bringing all the code the developers are using closer together</li>
<li>One big benefit is that WIP code gets tested much faster (and bugs get fixed early on)
***</li>
</ul>

<h2>Feedback/Questions</h2>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s21yQtBCCK" rel="nofollow">Matthew writes in</a></li>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s21oFA80kY" rel="nofollow">Chris writes in</a></li>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s2JYvTlJlm" rel="nofollow">Anonymous writes in</a></li>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s21LXvk53z" rel="nofollow">Bill writes in</a>
***</li>
</ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>This week we&#39;ll be talking with Ryan Lortie and Baptiste Daroussin about GNOME on BSD. Upstream development is finally treating the BSDs as a first class citizen, so we&#39;ll hear about how the recent porting efforts have been since.</p>

<h2>This episode was brought to you by</h2>

<p><a href="http://www.ixsystems.com/bsdnow" title="iXsystems"><img src="/images/1.png" alt="iXsystems - Enterprise Servers and Storage for Open Source" /></a><a href="http://www.digitalocean.com/" title="DigitalOcean"><img src="/images/2.png" alt="DigitalOcean - Simple Cloud Hosting, Built for Developers" /></a><a href="http://www.tarsnap.com/bsdnow" title="Tarsnap"><img src="/images/3.png" alt="Tarsnap - Online Backups for the Truly Paranoid" /></a></p>

<hr>

<h2>Headlines</h2>

<h3><a href="https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=143725996614627&w=2" rel="nofollow">OpenBSD presents tame</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>Theo de Raadt sent out an email detailing OpenBSD&#39;s new &quot;tame&quot; subsystem, written by Nicholas Marriott and himself, for restricting what processes can and can&#39;t do</li>
<li>When using tame, programs will switch to a &quot;restricted-service operating mode,&quot; limiting them to only the things they actually need to do</li>
<li>As for the background: &quot;Generally there are two models of operation. The first model requires a major rewrite of application software for effective use (ie. capsicum). The other model in common use lacks granularity, and allows or denies an operation throughout the entire lifetime of a process. As a result, they lack differentiation between program &#39;initialization&#39; versus &#39;main servicing loop.&#39; systrace had the same problem. My observation is that programs need a large variety of calls during initialization, but few in their main loops.&quot;</li>
<li>Some initial categories of operation include: computation, memory management, read-write operations on file descriptors, opening of files and, of course, networking</li>
<li>Restrictions can also be stacked further into the lifespan of the process, but removed abilities can never be regained (obviously)</li>
<li>Anything that tries to access resources outside of its in-place limits gets terminated with a SIGKILL or, optionally, a SIGABRT (which can produce useful core dumps for investigation)</li>
<li>Also included are 29 examples of userland programs that get additional protection with very minimal changes to the source - only 2 or 3 lines needing changed in the case of binaries like cat, ps, dmesg, etc.</li>
<li>This is an initial work-in-progress version of tame, so there may be more improvements or <a href="https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=143740834710502&w=2" rel="nofollow">further</a> <a href="https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=143741052411159&w=2" rel="nofollow">control</a> options added before it hits a release (very specific access policies can <a href="https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2522" rel="nofollow">sometimes backfire</a>, however)</li>
<li>The man page, also included in the mail, provides some specifics about how to integrate tame properly into your code (which, by design, was made very easy to do - making it simple means third party programs are more likely to <em>actually use it</em>)</li>
<li>Kernel bits are <a href="https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=143727335416513&w=2" rel="nofollow">in the tree now</a>, with userland changes starting to trickle in too</li>
<li>Combined with a <a href="http://www.bsdnow.tv/episodes/2015_05_13-exclusive_disjunction" rel="nofollow">myriad of memory protections</a>, tight privilege separation and (above <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBSD_security_features" rel="nofollow">all else</a>) good coding practices, tame should further harden the OpenBSD security fortress</li>
<li>Further <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9928221" rel="nofollow">discussion</a> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3dsr0t" rel="nofollow">can</a> <a href="http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20150719000800&mode=flat" rel="nofollow">be</a> <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9909429" rel="nofollow">found</a> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3ds66o" rel="nofollow">in</a> <a href="https://lobste.rs/s/tbbtfs" rel="nofollow">the</a> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/openbsd/comments/3ds64c" rel="nofollow">usual</a> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/BSD/comments/3ds681" rel="nofollow">places</a> you&#39;d expect
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="https://wiki.freebsd.org/Docker" rel="nofollow">Using Docker on FreeBSD</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>With the experimental Docker port landing in FreeBSD a few weeks ago, some initial docs are starting to show up</li>
<li>This docker is &quot;the real thing,&quot; and isn’t using a virtual machine as the backend - as such, it has some limitations</li>
<li>The FreeBSD wiki has a page detailing how it works in general, as well as more info about those limitations</li>
<li>When running Linux containers, it will only work as well as the Linux ABI compat layer for your version of FreeBSD (11.0, or -CURRENT when we&#39;re recording this, is where all the action is for 64bit support)</li>
<li>For users on 10.X, there&#39;s also a FreeBSD container available, which allows you to use Docker as a fancy jail manager (it uses the jail subsystem internally)</li>
<li>Give it a try, let us know how you find it to be compared to other solutions
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/doas" rel="nofollow">OpenBSD imports doas, removes sudo</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>OpenBSD has included the ubiquitous &quot;sudo&quot; utility for many years now, and the current maintainer of sudo (Todd C. Miller) is also a long-time OpenBSD dev</li>
<li>The version included in the base system was much smaller than the latest current version used elsewhere, but was based on older code</li>
<li>Some internal discussion lead to the decision that sudo should probably be moved to ports now, where it can be updated easily and offer all the extra features that were missing in base (LDAP and whatnot)</li>
<li>Ted Unangst conjured up with a rewritten utility to replace it in the base system, dubbed &quot;do as,&quot; with the aim of being more simple and compact</li>
<li>There were concerns that sudo was too big and too complicated, and a quick &#39;n&#39; dirty check reveals that doas is around 350 lines of code, while sudo is around 10,000 - which would you rather have as a setuid root binary?</li>
<li>After the initial import, a number of developers began reviewing and improving various bits here and there</li>
<li>You can <a href="http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/doas/" rel="nofollow">check out the code</a> now if you&#39;re interested</li>
<li><a href="http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man1/doas.1" rel="nofollow">Command usage</a> and <a href="http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man5/doas.conf.5" rel="nofollow">config syntax</a> seem pretty straightforward</li>
<li>More <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9914693" rel="nofollow">discussion</a> on HN
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/freebsd/comments/3d80vt/what_would_you_like_to_see_in_freebsd/" rel="nofollow">What would you like to see in FreeBSD</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>Adrian Chadd started a reddit thread about areas in which FreeBSD could be improved, asking the community what they&#39;d like to see</li>
<li>There are over <strong>200</strong> comments that span a wide range of topics, so we&#39;ll just cover a few of the more popular requests - check the very long thread if you&#39;re interested in more</li>
<li>The top comment says things don&#39;t &quot;just work,&quot; citing failover link aggregation of LACP laggs, PPPoE issues, disorganized jail configuration options, unclear CARP configuration and userland dtrace being unstable</li>
<li>Another common one was that there are <em>three</em> firewalls in the base system, with ipfilter and pf being kinda dead now - should they be removed, and more focus put into ipfw?</li>
<li>Video drivers also came up frequently, with users hoping for better OpenGL support and support for newer graphics cards from Intel and AMD - similar comments were made about wireless chipsets as well</li>
<li>Some other replies included more clarity with pkgng output, paying more attention to security issues, updating PF to match the one in OpenBSD, improved laptop support, a graphical installer, LibreSSL in base, more focus on embedded MIPS devices, binary packages with different config options, steam support and lots more</li>
<li>At least one user suggested better &quot;marketing&quot; for FreeBSD, with more advocacy and (hopefully) more business adoption</li>
<li>That one really applies to all the BSDs, and regular users (that&#39;s you listening to this) can help make it happen for whichever ones you use <em>right now</em></li>
<li>Maybe Adrian can singlehandedly do all the work and make all the users happy
***</li>
</ul>

<h2>Interview - Ryan Lortie &amp; Baptiste Daroussin</h2>

<p>Porting the latest GNOME code to FreeBSD</p>

<hr>

<h2>News Roundup</h2>

<h3><a href="http://stable.rcesoftware.com/resflash/" rel="nofollow">Introducing resflash</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>If you haven&#39;t heard of resflash before, it&#39;s &quot;a tool for building OpenBSD images for embedded and cloud environments in a programmatic, reproducible way&quot;</li>
<li>One of the major benefits to images like this is the read-only filesystem, so there&#39;s no possibility of filesystem corruption if power is lost</li>
<li>There&#39;s an optional read-write partition as well, used for any persistent changes you want to make</li>
<li>You can check out the source code <a href="https://github.com/bconway/resflash" rel="nofollow">on Github</a> or read the main site for more info
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="http://pid1.com/posts/post10.html" rel="nofollow">Jails with iocage</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>There are a growing number of FreeBSD jail management utilities: ezjail, cbsd, warden and a few others</li>
<li>After looking at all the different choices, the author of this blog post eventually settled on <a href="https://github.com/iocage/iocage" rel="nofollow">iocage</a> for the job</li>
<li>The post walks you through the basic configuration and usage of iocage for creating managing jails</li>
<li>If you&#39;ve been unhappy with ezjail or some of the others, iocage might be worth giving a try instead (it also has really good ZFS integration)
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2015-July/207892.html" rel="nofollow">DragonFly GPU improvements</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>DragonFlyBSD continues to up their graphics game, this time with Intel&#39;s ValleyView series of CPUs</li>
<li>These GPUs are primarily used in the newer Atom CPUs and offer much better performance than the older ones</li>
<li>A git branch was created to hold the fixes for now while the last remaining bugs get fixed</li>
<li>Fully-accelerated Broadwell support and an update to newer DRM code are also available in the git branch, and will be merged to the main tree after some testing
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/branchless-development" rel="nofollow">Branchless development</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>Ted Unangst has a new blog post up, talking about software branches and the effects of having (or not having) them</li>
<li>He covers integrating and merging code, and the versioning problems that can happen with multiple people contributing at once</li>
<li>&quot;For an open source project, branching is counter intuitively antisocial. For instance, I usually tell people I’m running OpenBSD, but that’s kind of a lie. I’m actually running teduBSD, which is like OpenBSD but has some changes to make it even better. Of course, you can’t have teduBSD because I’m selfish. I’m also lazy, and only inclined to make my changes work for me, not everyone else.&quot;</li>
<li>The solution, according to him, is bringing all the code the developers are using closer together</li>
<li>One big benefit is that WIP code gets tested much faster (and bugs get fixed early on)
***</li>
</ul>

<h2>Feedback/Questions</h2>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s21yQtBCCK" rel="nofollow">Matthew writes in</a></li>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s21oFA80kY" rel="nofollow">Chris writes in</a></li>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s2JYvTlJlm" rel="nofollow">Anonymous writes in</a></li>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s21LXvk53z" rel="nofollow">Bill writes in</a>
***</li>
</ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>60: Don't Buy a Router</title>
  <link>https://www.bsdnow.tv/60</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">e61941d1-74ff-40d0-91f6-86ff864cf99b</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>JT Pennington</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/c91b88f1-e824-4815-bcb8-5227818d6010/e61941d1-74ff-40d0-91f6-86ff864cf99b.mp3" length="49443412" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>JT Pennington</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>This week on the show we're joined by Olivier Cochard-Labbé, the creator of both FreeNAS and the BSD Router Project! We'll be discussing what the BSD Router Project is, what it's for and where it's going. All this week's headlines and answers to viewer-submitted questions, on BSD Now - the place to B.. SD.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:08:40</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/c/c91b88f1-e824-4815-bcb8-5227818d6010/cover.jpg?v=4"/>
  <description>This week on the show we're joined by Olivier Cochard-Labbé, the creator of both FreeNAS and the BSD Router Project! We'll be discussing what the BSD Router Project is, what it's for and where it's going. All this week's headlines and answers to viewer-submitted questions, on BSD Now - the place to B.. SD.
This episode was brought to you by
&lt;a href="http://www.ixsystems.com/bsdnow" title="iXsystems"&gt;&lt;img src="/images/iXlogo2.png" alt="iXsystems - Enterprise servers and storage for open source"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tarsnap.com/bsdnow" title="Tarsnap"&gt;&lt;img src="/images/tarsnap1.png" alt="Tarsnap - online backups for the truly paranoid"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
Headlines
BSD Devroom CFP (https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/fosdem/2014-October/002038.html)
This year's FOSDEM conference (Belgium, Jan 31st - Feb 1st) is having a dedicated BSD devroom
They've issued a call for papers on anything BSD-related, and we always love more presentations
If you're in the Belgium area or plan on going, submit a talk about something cool you're doing
There's also a mailing list (https://lists.fosdem.org/listinfo/bsd-devroom) and some more information in the original post
***
Bhyve SVM code merge (https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2014-October/002905.html)
The bhyve_svm code has been in the "projects" tree of FreeBSD, but is now ready (https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&amp;amp;revision=273375) for -CURRENT
This changeset will finally allow bhyve to run on AMD CPUs, where it was previously limited to Intel only
All the supported operating systems and utilities should work on both now
One thing to note: bhyve doesn't support PCI passthrough on AMD just yet
There may still be some issues (https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2014-October/002935.html) though
***
NetBSD at Open Source Conference Tokyo (https://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-advocacy/2014/10/20/msg000671.html)
The Japanese NetBSD users group held a booth at another recent open source conference
As always, they were running NetBSD on everything you can imagine
One of the users reports back to the mailing list on their experience, providing lots of pictures and links
Here's an interesting screenshot of NetBSD running various other BSDs in Xen (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B0NnfcbCEAAmKIU.jpg:large)
***
More BSD switchers every day (https://www.reddit.com/r/unix/comments/2il383/question_about_the_bsd_community_as_a_whole/)
A decade-long Linux user is considering making the switch, and asks Reddit about the BSD community
Tired of the pointless bickering he sees in his current community, he asks if the same problems exist over here and what he should expect
So far, he's found that BSD people seem to act more level-headed about things, and are much more practical, whereas some FSF/GNU/GPL people make open source a religion
There's also another semi-related thread (https://www.reddit.com/r/BSD/comments/2jpxj9/question_about_the_current_state_of_freebsd/) about another Linux user wanting to switch to BSD because of systemd and GNU people
There are some extremely well written and thought-out comments in the replies (in both threads), be sure to give them all a read
Maybe the OPs should've just watched this show
***
Interview - Olivier Cochard-Labbé - olivier@cochard.me (mailto:olivier@cochard.me) / @ocochardlabbe (https://twitter.com/ocochardlabbe)
The BSD Router Project
News Roundup
FreeBSD -CURRENT on a T420 (https://www.banym.de/freebsd/install-freebsd-11-on-thinkpad-t420)
Thinkpads are quite popular with BSD developers and users
Most of the hardware seems to be supported across the BSDs (especially wifi)
This article walks through installing FreeBSD -CURRENT on a Thinkpad T420 with UEFI
If you've got a Thinkpad, or especially this specific one, have a look at some of the steps involved
***
FreeNAS on a Supermicro 5018A-MHN4 (https://www.teckelworks.com/2014/10/building-a-freenas-server-with-a-supermicro-5018a-mhn4/)
More and more people are migrating their NAS devices to BSD-based solutions
In this post, the author goes through setting up FreeNAS on some of his new hardware
His new rack-mounted FreeNAS machine has a low power Atom with eight cores and 64GB of RAM - quite a lot for its small form factor
The rest of the post details all of the hardware he chose and goes through the build process (with lots of cool pictures)
***
Hardening procfs and linprocfs (http://hardenedbsd.org/article/shawn-webb/2014-10-15/hardening-procfs-and-linprocfs)
There was an exploit published recently for SFTP in OpenSSH, but it mostly just affected Linux
There exists a native procfs in FreeBSD, which was the target point of that exploit, but it's not used very often
The Linux emulation layer also supports its own linprocfs, which was affected as well
The HardenedBSD guys weigh in on how to best solve the problem, and now support an additional protection layer from writing to memory with procfs
If you want to learn more about ASLR and HardenedBSD, be sure to check out our interview with Shawn (http://www.bsdnow.tv/episodes/2014_08_27-reverse_takeover) too
***
pfSense monitoring with bandwidthd (http://pfsensesetup.com/bandwidth-monitoring-with-bandwidthd/)
A lot of people run pfSense on their home network, and it's really useful to monitor the bandwidth usage
This article will walk you through setting up bandwidthd to do exactly that
bandwidthd monitors based on the IP address, rather than per-interface
It can also build some cool HTML graphs, and we love those pfSense graphs
Have a look at our bandwidth monitoring and testing (http://www.bsdnow.tv/tutorials/vnstat-iperf) tutorial for some more ideas
***
Feedback/Questions
Dave writes in (http://slexy.org/view/s2b5ZZ5qCv)
Chris writes in (http://slexy.org/view/s20aVvhv2d)
Zeke writes in (http://slexy.org/view/s2Vmwxy1QM)
Bostjan writes in (http://slexy.org/view/s2LB6MKoNT)
Patrick writes in (http://slexy.org/view/s2xxB9uOuV)
***
Mailing List Gold
More (https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&amp;amp;m=141357595922692&amp;amp;w=2) old bugs (https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&amp;amp;m=141358124924479&amp;amp;w=2)
The Right Font™ (https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&amp;amp;m=141332534304117&amp;amp;w=2) (see also (https://twitter.com/blakkheim/status/522162864409546753))
*** 
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>freebsd, openbsd, netbsd, dragonflybsd, pcbsd, tutorial, howto, guide, bsd, interview, bsdrp, bsd router project, freenas, nas4free, router, gateway, firewall, pfsense, nanobsd, hardenedbsd, bhyve, devroom, fosdem</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>This week on the show we&#39;re joined by Olivier Cochard-Labbé, the creator of both FreeNAS and the BSD Router Project! We&#39;ll be discussing what the BSD Router Project is, what it&#39;s for and where it&#39;s going. All this week&#39;s headlines and answers to viewer-submitted questions, on BSD Now - the place to B.. SD.</p>

<h2>This episode was brought to you by</h2>

<p><a href="http://www.ixsystems.com/bsdnow" title="iXsystems"><img src="/images/iXlogo2.png" alt="iXsystems - Enterprise servers and storage for open source" /></a><a href="http://www.tarsnap.com/bsdnow" title="Tarsnap"><img src="/images/tarsnap1.png" alt="Tarsnap - online backups for the truly paranoid" /></a></p>

<hr>

<h2>Headlines</h2>

<h3><a href="https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/fosdem/2014-October/002038.html" rel="nofollow">BSD Devroom CFP</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>This year&#39;s FOSDEM conference (Belgium, Jan 31st - Feb 1st) is having a dedicated BSD devroom</li>
<li>They&#39;ve issued a call for papers on anything BSD-related, and we always love more presentations</li>
<li>If you&#39;re in the Belgium area or plan on going, submit a talk about something cool you&#39;re doing</li>
<li>There&#39;s also <a href="https://lists.fosdem.org/listinfo/bsd-devroom" rel="nofollow">a mailing list</a> and some more information in the original post
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2014-October/002905.html" rel="nofollow">Bhyve SVM code merge</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>The bhyve_svm code has been in the &quot;projects&quot; tree of FreeBSD, but is <a href="https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=273375" rel="nofollow">now ready</a> for -CURRENT</li>
<li>This changeset will finally allow bhyve to run on AMD CPUs, where it was previously limited to Intel only</li>
<li>All the supported operating systems and utilities should work on both now</li>
<li>One thing to note: bhyve doesn&#39;t support PCI passthrough on AMD just yet</li>
<li>There may still be <a href="https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2014-October/002935.html" rel="nofollow">some issues</a> though
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="https://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-advocacy/2014/10/20/msg000671.html" rel="nofollow">NetBSD at Open Source Conference Tokyo</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>The Japanese NetBSD users group held a booth at another recent open source conference</li>
<li>As always, they were running NetBSD on everything you can imagine</li>
<li>One of the users reports back to the mailing list on their experience, providing lots of pictures and links</li>
<li>Here&#39;s an interesting <a href="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B0NnfcbCEAAmKIU.jpg:large" rel="nofollow">screenshot of NetBSD running various other BSDs in Xen</a>
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/unix/comments/2il383/question_about_the_bsd_community_as_a_whole/" rel="nofollow">More BSD switchers every day</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>A decade-long Linux user is considering making the switch, and asks Reddit about the BSD community</li>
<li>Tired of the pointless bickering he sees in his current community, he asks if the same problems exist over here and what he should expect</li>
<li>So far, he&#39;s found that BSD people seem to act more level-headed about things, and are much more practical, whereas some FSF/GNU/GPL people make open source a religion</li>
<li>There&#39;s also <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/BSD/comments/2jpxj9/question_about_the_current_state_of_freebsd/" rel="nofollow">another semi-related thread</a> about another Linux user wanting to switch to BSD because of systemd and GNU people</li>
<li>There are some extremely well written and thought-out comments in the replies (in both threads), be sure to give them all a read</li>
<li>Maybe the OPs should&#39;ve just watched this show
***</li>
</ul>

<h2>Interview - Olivier Cochard-Labbé - <a href="mailto:olivier@cochard.me" rel="nofollow">olivier@cochard.me</a> / <a href="https://twitter.com/ocochardlabbe" rel="nofollow">@ocochardlabbe</a></h2>

<p>The BSD Router Project</p>

<hr>

<h2>News Roundup</h2>

<h3><a href="https://www.banym.de/freebsd/install-freebsd-11-on-thinkpad-t420" rel="nofollow">FreeBSD -CURRENT on a T420</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>Thinkpads are quite popular with BSD developers and users</li>
<li>Most of the hardware seems to be supported across the BSDs (especially wifi)</li>
<li>This article walks through installing FreeBSD -CURRENT on a Thinkpad T420 with UEFI</li>
<li>If you&#39;ve got a Thinkpad, or especially this specific one, have a look at some of the steps involved
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="https://www.teckelworks.com/2014/10/building-a-freenas-server-with-a-supermicro-5018a-mhn4/" rel="nofollow">FreeNAS on a Supermicro 5018A-MHN4</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>More and more people are migrating their NAS devices to BSD-based solutions</li>
<li>In this post, the author goes through setting up FreeNAS on some of his new hardware</li>
<li>His new rack-mounted FreeNAS machine has a low power Atom with eight cores and 64GB of RAM - quite a lot for its small form factor</li>
<li>The rest of the post details all of the hardware he chose and goes through the build process (with lots of cool pictures)
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="http://hardenedbsd.org/article/shawn-webb/2014-10-15/hardening-procfs-and-linprocfs" rel="nofollow">Hardening procfs and linprocfs</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>There was an exploit published recently for SFTP in OpenSSH, but it mostly just affected Linux</li>
<li>There exists a native procfs in FreeBSD, which was the target point of that exploit, but it&#39;s not used very often</li>
<li>The Linux emulation layer also supports its own linprocfs, which was affected as well</li>
<li>The HardenedBSD guys weigh in on how to best solve the problem, and now support an additional protection layer from writing to memory with procfs</li>
<li>If you want to learn more about ASLR and HardenedBSD, be sure to check out <a href="http://www.bsdnow.tv/episodes/2014_08_27-reverse_takeover" rel="nofollow">our interview with Shawn</a> too
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="http://pfsensesetup.com/bandwidth-monitoring-with-bandwidthd/" rel="nofollow">pfSense monitoring with bandwidthd</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>A lot of people run pfSense on their home network, and it&#39;s really useful to monitor the bandwidth usage</li>
<li>This article will walk you through setting up bandwidthd to do exactly that</li>
<li>bandwidthd monitors based on the IP address, rather than per-interface</li>
<li>It can also build some cool HTML graphs, and we love those pfSense graphs</li>
<li>Have a look at our <a href="http://www.bsdnow.tv/tutorials/vnstat-iperf" rel="nofollow">bandwidth monitoring and testing</a> tutorial for some more ideas
***</li>
</ul>

<h2>Feedback/Questions</h2>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s2b5ZZ5qCv" rel="nofollow">Dave writes in</a></li>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s20aVvhv2d" rel="nofollow">Chris writes in</a></li>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s2Vmwxy1QM" rel="nofollow">Zeke writes in</a></li>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s2LB6MKoNT" rel="nofollow">Bostjan writes in</a></li>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s2xxB9uOuV" rel="nofollow">Patrick writes in</a>
***</li>
</ul>

<h2>Mailing List Gold</h2>

<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=141357595922692&w=2" rel="nofollow">More</a> <a href="https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=141358124924479&w=2" rel="nofollow">old bugs</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=141332534304117&w=2" rel="nofollow">The Right Font™</a> (<a href="https://twitter.com/blakkheim/status/522162864409546753" rel="nofollow">see also</a>)
***</li>
</ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>This week on the show we&#39;re joined by Olivier Cochard-Labbé, the creator of both FreeNAS and the BSD Router Project! We&#39;ll be discussing what the BSD Router Project is, what it&#39;s for and where it&#39;s going. All this week&#39;s headlines and answers to viewer-submitted questions, on BSD Now - the place to B.. SD.</p>

<h2>This episode was brought to you by</h2>

<p><a href="http://www.ixsystems.com/bsdnow" title="iXsystems"><img src="/images/iXlogo2.png" alt="iXsystems - Enterprise servers and storage for open source" /></a><a href="http://www.tarsnap.com/bsdnow" title="Tarsnap"><img src="/images/tarsnap1.png" alt="Tarsnap - online backups for the truly paranoid" /></a></p>

<hr>

<h2>Headlines</h2>

<h3><a href="https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/fosdem/2014-October/002038.html" rel="nofollow">BSD Devroom CFP</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>This year&#39;s FOSDEM conference (Belgium, Jan 31st - Feb 1st) is having a dedicated BSD devroom</li>
<li>They&#39;ve issued a call for papers on anything BSD-related, and we always love more presentations</li>
<li>If you&#39;re in the Belgium area or plan on going, submit a talk about something cool you&#39;re doing</li>
<li>There&#39;s also <a href="https://lists.fosdem.org/listinfo/bsd-devroom" rel="nofollow">a mailing list</a> and some more information in the original post
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2014-October/002905.html" rel="nofollow">Bhyve SVM code merge</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>The bhyve_svm code has been in the &quot;projects&quot; tree of FreeBSD, but is <a href="https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=273375" rel="nofollow">now ready</a> for -CURRENT</li>
<li>This changeset will finally allow bhyve to run on AMD CPUs, where it was previously limited to Intel only</li>
<li>All the supported operating systems and utilities should work on both now</li>
<li>One thing to note: bhyve doesn&#39;t support PCI passthrough on AMD just yet</li>
<li>There may still be <a href="https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2014-October/002935.html" rel="nofollow">some issues</a> though
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="https://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-advocacy/2014/10/20/msg000671.html" rel="nofollow">NetBSD at Open Source Conference Tokyo</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>The Japanese NetBSD users group held a booth at another recent open source conference</li>
<li>As always, they were running NetBSD on everything you can imagine</li>
<li>One of the users reports back to the mailing list on their experience, providing lots of pictures and links</li>
<li>Here&#39;s an interesting <a href="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B0NnfcbCEAAmKIU.jpg:large" rel="nofollow">screenshot of NetBSD running various other BSDs in Xen</a>
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/unix/comments/2il383/question_about_the_bsd_community_as_a_whole/" rel="nofollow">More BSD switchers every day</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>A decade-long Linux user is considering making the switch, and asks Reddit about the BSD community</li>
<li>Tired of the pointless bickering he sees in his current community, he asks if the same problems exist over here and what he should expect</li>
<li>So far, he&#39;s found that BSD people seem to act more level-headed about things, and are much more practical, whereas some FSF/GNU/GPL people make open source a religion</li>
<li>There&#39;s also <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/BSD/comments/2jpxj9/question_about_the_current_state_of_freebsd/" rel="nofollow">another semi-related thread</a> about another Linux user wanting to switch to BSD because of systemd and GNU people</li>
<li>There are some extremely well written and thought-out comments in the replies (in both threads), be sure to give them all a read</li>
<li>Maybe the OPs should&#39;ve just watched this show
***</li>
</ul>

<h2>Interview - Olivier Cochard-Labbé - <a href="mailto:olivier@cochard.me" rel="nofollow">olivier@cochard.me</a> / <a href="https://twitter.com/ocochardlabbe" rel="nofollow">@ocochardlabbe</a></h2>

<p>The BSD Router Project</p>

<hr>

<h2>News Roundup</h2>

<h3><a href="https://www.banym.de/freebsd/install-freebsd-11-on-thinkpad-t420" rel="nofollow">FreeBSD -CURRENT on a T420</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>Thinkpads are quite popular with BSD developers and users</li>
<li>Most of the hardware seems to be supported across the BSDs (especially wifi)</li>
<li>This article walks through installing FreeBSD -CURRENT on a Thinkpad T420 with UEFI</li>
<li>If you&#39;ve got a Thinkpad, or especially this specific one, have a look at some of the steps involved
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="https://www.teckelworks.com/2014/10/building-a-freenas-server-with-a-supermicro-5018a-mhn4/" rel="nofollow">FreeNAS on a Supermicro 5018A-MHN4</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>More and more people are migrating their NAS devices to BSD-based solutions</li>
<li>In this post, the author goes through setting up FreeNAS on some of his new hardware</li>
<li>His new rack-mounted FreeNAS machine has a low power Atom with eight cores and 64GB of RAM - quite a lot for its small form factor</li>
<li>The rest of the post details all of the hardware he chose and goes through the build process (with lots of cool pictures)
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="http://hardenedbsd.org/article/shawn-webb/2014-10-15/hardening-procfs-and-linprocfs" rel="nofollow">Hardening procfs and linprocfs</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>There was an exploit published recently for SFTP in OpenSSH, but it mostly just affected Linux</li>
<li>There exists a native procfs in FreeBSD, which was the target point of that exploit, but it&#39;s not used very often</li>
<li>The Linux emulation layer also supports its own linprocfs, which was affected as well</li>
<li>The HardenedBSD guys weigh in on how to best solve the problem, and now support an additional protection layer from writing to memory with procfs</li>
<li>If you want to learn more about ASLR and HardenedBSD, be sure to check out <a href="http://www.bsdnow.tv/episodes/2014_08_27-reverse_takeover" rel="nofollow">our interview with Shawn</a> too
***</li>
</ul>

<h3><a href="http://pfsensesetup.com/bandwidth-monitoring-with-bandwidthd/" rel="nofollow">pfSense monitoring with bandwidthd</a></h3>

<ul>
<li>A lot of people run pfSense on their home network, and it&#39;s really useful to monitor the bandwidth usage</li>
<li>This article will walk you through setting up bandwidthd to do exactly that</li>
<li>bandwidthd monitors based on the IP address, rather than per-interface</li>
<li>It can also build some cool HTML graphs, and we love those pfSense graphs</li>
<li>Have a look at our <a href="http://www.bsdnow.tv/tutorials/vnstat-iperf" rel="nofollow">bandwidth monitoring and testing</a> tutorial for some more ideas
***</li>
</ul>

<h2>Feedback/Questions</h2>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s2b5ZZ5qCv" rel="nofollow">Dave writes in</a></li>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s20aVvhv2d" rel="nofollow">Chris writes in</a></li>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s2Vmwxy1QM" rel="nofollow">Zeke writes in</a></li>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s2LB6MKoNT" rel="nofollow">Bostjan writes in</a></li>
<li><a href="http://slexy.org/view/s2xxB9uOuV" rel="nofollow">Patrick writes in</a>
***</li>
</ul>

<h2>Mailing List Gold</h2>

<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=141357595922692&w=2" rel="nofollow">More</a> <a href="https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=141358124924479&w=2" rel="nofollow">old bugs</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=141332534304117&w=2" rel="nofollow">The Right Font™</a> (<a href="https://twitter.com/blakkheim/status/522162864409546753" rel="nofollow">see also</a>)
***</li>
</ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
